• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Compounds of the formula (I): wherein:X = O, S, or NOH;R¹ is H or CH₃;n = 1, 2, or 3;R², R³, and R⁴ are as defined in one of the follow­ing paragraphs a) R² and R³ are independently Cl or Br, and R⁴ is H; b) R², R³, and R⁴ are independently Cl or Br; c) R² is F, R³ is Cl, and R⁴ is H; or d) R² and R³ are CH₃ or C₂H₅, and R⁴ is H; R⁵, R⁶, and R⁷ are as defined in one of the follow­ing paragraphs a) one of R⁶ and R⁷ is CH₃, R⁵ and the other of R⁶ and R⁷ is H; b) R⁵ and R⁶ are H; and R⁷ is F, Cl, or Br; c) R⁵ and R⁷ are independently F, Cl, or Br and R⁶ is H; d) R⁵ and R⁶ are independently F, Cl, or Br, and R⁷ is H; e) R⁶ and R⁷ are independently F, Cl, or Br, and R⁵ is H; or f) R⁶ is phenoxy and R⁵ and R⁷ are H, are useful fungicides, either alone or in combination with other fungicides.
    公开号:SU1760983A3
    申请号:SU884356787
    申请日:1988-10-25
    公开日:1992-09-07
    发明作者:Рэй Арнольд Вендель；Дэвид Дэйвенпорт Джеймс
    申请人:Эли Лилли Энд Компани (Фирма)；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    Protective activity of 2,6-dichloro-M- {4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl methyl} benzamide
    against Eryslphe graminls
    % combat disease
    Protective activity of 2, b-dichloro-M- {4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl methyl} benzamide
    against wheat Erysiphe graminis
    % combat disease
    Protective activity of 2,6-dichloro-M- {4- (trifluoromethyl) phenylZmethyl} benzamide
    against Erysiphe graminls
    % combat disease
    Table 4
    Table 5
    Therapeutic activity of 2,6-dichloro-M- {4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl methyl} benzamide
    Wheat Erysiphe graminls
    % combat disease
    2.6-dichloro-M- {4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl methyl} benzamide killing pathogens
    against Erysiphe graminls
    x Method 1:% control of the disease based on the evaluation of all (live and dead) pathogens on the leaf surface,
    xx Method 2:% control of the disease based on an assessment of all living and dead pathogens of powdery mildew on the surface of leaves, excluding the percentage of all dead on the surface of powdery mildew pathogens.
    Pathogen-killing activity of 2,6-dichloro M- (4- {trifluoromethyl) phenyl methyl} benzamide against Erysiphe graminis; wheat
    Table 6
    Table 7
    Table 8
    x Method 1:% control of the disease based on the assessment of all (live and dead) pathogens on the leaf surface.
    xx Method2:% control of the disease based on an assessment of all the living and dead pathogens of powdery mildew on the surface of leaves, excluding the% of all dead on the surface of powdery mildew pathogens.
    Table E Application on the leaves. Whew Milk Dew
    Example 172
    Example
    72
    Continued table. eight
    00.00
    0.00
    five
    2.50
    9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 8.5 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 9.0 9.0 8.5 8, 0 7.0 5.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 8.5 9.0 6.0 9.0 8.5 8.5 8.0 5.0 5.0 9.0 7.0 9 , 0 8.0
    23176098321
    Continued Table 9,
    Continued table. Uh
    29
    72
    Wheat grain processing for powdery mildew protection
    Table 11
    Application to the leaves. False mealy dew vine
    Connection Time
    : J
    Table 12
    Application to the leaves. Downy Mildew Grape Vine
    Compound
    I Time, h I
    176098330
    Continuation of table 9
    1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    Table 10
    Dose, million
    g
    Security grade
    Dose, million
    I
    Security grade
    Table
    Application to the leaves. Mildew Blony Dew
    Example 12
    k
    96
    Table 14
    Application to the leaves. Mealy Miller Pumpkin Dew
    Table
    Application to the leaves. Wheat leaf rust
    Example 1
    72
    72 92
    13
    1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    1.0
    1.0
    1.0
    15

    1.0
    1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    Drawing on rice
    1760983M
    Leaf table. Pyrikul Rioe
    one
    72
    21
    200.00 100.00 50.00, 00
    200.0
    Example 1
    100.00
    example k
    example k example 7
    example 8
    example 8
    2k 72
    2k
    2k
    2k
    50.00
    , 200 200.00 100.00 50.00
    200.00
    100.00
    50.00
    200.00
    100.00
    50.00
    , 00
    200.00
    100.00
    50.00
    , 00
    200.00
    100.00
    50.00
    If 00.0
    200.00
    100.00
    50.00
    00.00
    200.00
    100.00
    50.00
    OD
    200.00
    100.00
    50.00
    400.00 200.00
    100.00 50.00
    sixteen
    1.0, 0, 0, 0, 00
    , 0
    , 0
    , 0
    , 0
    , 1,0 1,0 1,0
    1.0
    1.0 8.0
    8.0 7.5 8.0 7.5 8.0 6.0 8.0 3.0 2.0
    3.0
    2.0 1.0
    1.0 1.0
    1.0
    1.0 1.0 3.0
    1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    1.0
    1.0
    1.0
    8.5 8.5 7.0 6.5
    t, o 1.0
    1.0 1.0
    : l
    7.5 5.0
    Table 17 Soil irrigation. Pyriculiasis rice
    Compound
    Time, h I Dose, f / a
    Example 148
    Example 4 48 Example 7 48 Example 8 48
    Table
    Soil processing. Wheat septoriosis
    Table
    Application to the leaves. Wheat septoriosis
    Evaluation of protection against disease
    1.0
    1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    1.0 3.0
    1.0 1.0 5.0
    3.0
    1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    18
    nineteen
    371760983
    Leaf application
    % combat disease
    38 Table FOR
    Table 21
    Table 23
    Treatment (Days of Assessment (days Dose% control of disease inoculation) after application, new

    Evaluation (days Dose of% control of disease after application, new
    -
    Treatment (days Evaluation (days Dose -% of disease control after inoculum - after application, new
    and
    -
    Table 30
    Dose of application, million
    % struggle with the disease, 1st sheet
    81.6 70.8 76.8
    Table 31
    Table 32
    权利要求:
    Claims (3)
    [1]
    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Method for the preparation of benzamide derivatives of the general formula 10 V'o w * 5 C-HN- (CH 2 ) ft - @ - R 6
    R z where Ri, R2 and Is have one of the following meanings: Ri and R2 are chlorine, ₽3 is hydrogen or Ri, R2 and R3 are chlorine, or Ri is fluorine, R 2 is chlorine, R3 is hydrogen;
    R4, Rs and R6 have one of the following meanings: R4 is hydrogen, Rs is CF3. Yab is hydrogen or Rs is hydrogen, R6 is CF3, or R4 is chlorine, Rs is fluorine, Rs is hydrogen;
    η = 1, 2 or 3, characterized in that the aralkylamine of the general formula
    H 2 N- (CH 2 ) „- © -R 6 where R4, Rs. Rs and η have the indicated meanings, are reacted with benzoyl chloride of the general formula
    Rj Ri O where Ri, Ya and Ya - have the indicated meanings.
    Table 1
    Example Compound Exit, % Mp. ° C 4 2,6-Dichloro-M- (3 [4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] propyl} benzamide 31 109-111 5 2,6-Dichloro-M- (2 | 3- (trifluoromethyl} phenyl] ethyl} benzamide 53 109-110 6 2,6-Dichloro-L1-methyl-M - {[4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl1-methyl} benzamide 71 No data 7 2-Chloro-6-fluoro-M ~ ([4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide 82 104-105 8 2,3,6-Trichloro-L1 - {[4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl | methyl] benzamide thirty No data 9 2.3.6-T trichloro-M - {[3- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide 37
    Table 2 Example! million * 1POWD Ric1 Leaf GRAY Down Leaf APPL I Leaf 1 MDEW BLAS Rust MOLD MDEW Spot SCAB J Blot
    1 400 877 83 1 1 62G1 - -8 - 82C 6 “ 1 1 14"100 7 6 1 1 16 - 5 3 1 t8 - 8 - - 1 1 • 78 - • 25 7 1 • " 4 - 2 - - -6 - - - - • 6 - - - - 7 - - - - 17 - - -- 1 6.25 4 - - - 6 - - - 15 - • 1 1,56 2 -1 2 400 7 ' 1 1 1 1 - - 7 - - 100 6 - - 1 1 5 25 3 -4 400 7 4 1 1 t - - -8 - - 100 7 - - 2 6 7 - • • 3 25 6 - - - - . 5 - - 1 6.25 2 - - - • 1 5 400 72C 1 1 1 1 - - ·5 - - 100 2 - - b 1. 625 14. 6 400 8 1 1 1 1 o. 100 6 - • 4" •5 - . - 4 1 6 25 1 - •·. 7 400 8 - •·. "·8 6 1 1 6 100 7 -. 7. 6 57 - - 1 -25 5 - '™. - - 4 • • 1 -6.25 2 - 18 400 6 4 62G 1 • 72G - - -- - 3 100 - - 1 1 1 1 25 - - 1 - - - 9 400 82g 1 62C .1 52C- -92g - - - - - 100 . 9 - - 6 1 48 - "· -- 25 9 - - - - -5 - - • - • 6.25 4 - • 4.
    Tables a 3
    Protective activity of 2,6-dichloro-1M - ([4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide 'against Eryslphe gramlnls barley% disease control
    Processing (days to inoculum - 1 2 4 1 2 4 tion)Assessment (days after inoculation) 7 7 7 14 14 14 Dose of application, million 1 1.56 54. 58 62 40 18 thirteen 6.25 100 100 69 80 59 75 25.0 100 100 97 85 79 93 Control group, % 38 38 25 63 46 43
    Table 4
    Protective activity of 2,6-dichloro-M - ([4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide ’against Eryslphe gramlnls
    wheat % disease control
    Processing (days to inoculum - 1 2 4 1 2 4 tion)Assessment (days after inoculation) 7 7 7 14 14 14 Dose of application, million 1 1.56 67 33 19 22 31 25 6.25 79 83 43 61 42 0 25.0 94 83 71 77 77 fifty Control group, %38 27 40 54 38
    Table 5
    Protective activity of 2,6-dichloro-M - ([4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide against Erysiphe gramlnls
    barley % disease control
    Treatment (days before inoculation) 1 2 4 1 2 4 Assessment (days after inoculation) 7 7 7 14 14 14 Application dose, million ' 1 1.56 17 33 58 70 23 thirteen 6.25 81 90 67 70 79 75 25.0 100 100 79 100 100 98 Control group, % 38 38 38 43 60 51
    : 1760983
    Table 6
    Therapeutic activity of 2,6-dichloro-M - ([4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide against wheat Erysiphe graminis% disease control
    Processing (days to inoculum - 1 2 4 1 2 4 tion)Assessment (days after inoculation) 7 7 7 14 14 14 Dose of application, million 1 1.56 42 94 68 58 46 72 6.25 100 100 84 91 99 100 25.0 100 100 100 100 99 100 Control group, % 38 38 fifteen 63 63 33
    about
    Table 7
    Pathogen-killing activity of 2.6-dichloro-G4 - {(4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide against Erysiphe graminis barley
    % fight against the disease. 1 x Method % fight against the disease. Method 2 XX Processing (days after inoku- 56 56 rations)Dosage, min ' 1 6.25 7472 8281 35.0 8455 8975 50,0 9255 9273 Control group, % 5953 6953
    x Method 1:% disease control based on the assessment of all (living and dead) pathogens on the leaf surface.
    xx Method 2:% control of the disease based on an assessment of all live and dead powdery mildew pathogens on the surface of the leaf excluding% of all dead on the surface of powdery mildew pathogens.
    Table 8
    Pathogen-killing activity of 2,6-dichloro-1M - {[4- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} benzamide against Erysiphe graminis ! wheat
    % fight against the disease. 1 x Method % fight against the disease. Me- I Tod 2 XX Days from inoculation to 56 56 bootsDosage, min ' 1 6.25 9482 9487 25.0 9473 9482 50,0 10077 10090
    1750983
    Continuation of the table. 8
    % fight against the disease. Method 1 x% fight against the disease. Method 2 XX Days from inoculation to treatment 5 6 5 6 i Control group,% 36 34 36 34
    x Method 1:% disease control based on the assessment of all (living and dead) pathogens on the leaf surface.
    x * Method2:% disease control based on an estimate of all live and dead powdery mildew pathogens on the surface of the leaf excluding% of all dead on the surface of powdery mildew pathogens.
    Table 9
    Application to leaves. Powdery Mildew
    Compound Time h Dose, mln ^ Assessment of degree of protection against illness. 1 2 3 4 Example 1 72 100.00 9.0 - - 8.0 - - 9.0 - - 9.0 - - 9.0 -. - 6.0 - - 8.5 - 50.00 9.0 . - 8.0 - - 9.0 - 9.0 - - 9.0 - - 6.0 - - 9.09.0 - 8.5 Example 1 - - 8.0 72 25 7.0 - - 5,0 - - 9.0 - 8.0 - - 9.0 - - 8.5 - - 9.0 - 6.0 - - 9.0 - - 8.5 - -. 8.5 - 8.0 - 12.50 5,0 - - 5,0 - 9.0 - - 7.0 - - 9.0 -8.0
    ‘21
    Continuation of the table. 9
    1 l I 3 F- ' 8.0 - - 5,0 - - 9.0 - - 8.0 - - 8.5 - - 7.06.25 M - - 7.5 - 6.12 .5.0 - 3.12 5.5 fifty 6.25 5,0 - 3.12 3.0 No. 100.00 8.0 - 50.00 8.0 - 25.00 7.0 - 12.50 7.0 Example 1 24 100.00 9.0 -9.0  ·. 9.0 -9.0 -9.0 -9.0 - 50.00 8.5 -8.0 -9.0 9.0 -9.0 -9.0 -8.5 - 25.00 8.5 -8.0 -8.5 -8.5 -9.0 -9.0 -8.5 - 12.50 8.5 -8.0 -8.5 -8.0 -. 9.0 - " 9 8.5 -8.5 4 100.00 8.0 - 50.00 8.0 - 25.00 7.0 - - 8.5 - 12.50 6.0 - - 7.0 - 6.25 6.0 Example 1 24 100.00 7.0 - - 8.0 -> - 7.0 -  - 7.0
    [2]
    2¾
    022,821 enie_tabl ™ d _9
    1 .1 2 ..... ............. ί 3 ..... Τ 6.5 -  50.00 7.0 - - 7.5 - - 6/0 - - 6.0 - - 6.0 - - 6.5 * 25.00 6.0 •  - 7.0 - " * 5,0 - - 5,0 β - - 5,0 - - 6.0 - 12.50 6.0 - -. 7.0 ·· ' - 5,0 • - 4.0 - - 5,0* 5.5 - 6.25 5,03.12 5,0 <♦ 8 100.00 5,0 - 50.00 2.025.00 1,0 - 12.50 2.0 72 100.00 ι, ο - - 5,0 , - - 6.0- 4, ο Example 1 72 50.00 3.01,0 Example 1: 5.0 Μ - * 3.0 - - 5,0 - 25.00 1,0 - * 2.0 . ** * 3.0 - - 4.0.- 1,0..- 1,0- 2.0- 1,0- 1,0* 3.0 - - 2.0 -2.0 - 12.50 3.0 Μ - 4.0 - - ι, ο- 1,0- 1,0- 1,0 2.0- 3.0
    Continuation of the table. 9 1 2 3 4 -2.0 - - 1,0 - 6.25 3.0 Example 1 - - 1,0 - 6.12 40 3.12 1,0 Example 4 48 100.00 5,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 24 100.00 7.0 - 50.00 2.0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 b 100.00 8.0 - 50.00 6.0 - 25.00 2.0 - 12.50 1,0 - 48 100.00 3.0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 Example 5 72 100.00 8.5 -. 5o, oo 8.0 - 25.00 7.0 - 12.50 6.5 24 100.00 9.0 - 50.00 8.5 Example 5 - 25.00 7.5 - 12.50 8.0 24 100.00 7.0 - 50.00 6.5 - 25.00 5,0 - 12.50 5,0 72 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 Example 6 48 50.00 7.0 - 25.00 6.0 - 12.50 2.0 - 6.25 6.0 Example 7 24 50.00 7.0 - 25.00 5,0 - 12.50 5,0 - 6.25 1,0 24 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 - 6.25 1,0 48 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 Example 7 - 6 th 25 1,0
    tab. 9
    Example
    Example
    Example
    Compound
    A
    Compound A
    Compound
    In ί
    2 1 3- g - 48 100.00 4.0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0. 24 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 4 100.00 4.0 -. 50.00 2.0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 48 100.00 4.0 - 50.00 2.0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 72 100.00 7.0 - 50.00 7.0 - 25.00 6.0 - 12.50 2.0 72 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 72 100.00 1,0 - 100.00 6.5 - 50.00 1,0 - 50.00 6.5 - 25.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 72 100.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 72 400.00 1,0 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 72 400.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 12.50 1,0 72 400.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0
    > 1760983
    Continuation of table.z
    1 2 3 if 12.50 1,0 72 400.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00. 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 • 12.50 1,0
    Table 10
    Processing wheat grains to protect against powdery mildew
    Compound Time h Dose, g / Kb Assessment of the degree of protection against the disease Example 1 192 0.101.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 8.0.
    Table 11 Application to the leaves. Downy mildew of grapevine
    Compound Time h | Dose, mln * Protection rating Example 1 48 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 4.0 24 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 24 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 48 100.00, 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0
    Table 12
    Application to leaves. Downy mildew grapevine
    Compound | Time Dose, million ** Protection rating Example 1 73 100.00 9.0 - 50.00 9.0 ’ - 25.00 3.0 72 100.00 7.0 - 50.00 8.0 - 25.00 ...
    Table 13 Application to the leaves. Powdery Mildew of Apple Tree
    Compound Time, h Dose, million '* Protection rating Example 1 2 400.00 SG1,0 - 100.00 1,0 4 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - 12.00 1,0 96 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 • - 12.50 1,0
    Table 14
    Application to leaves. Pumpkin Powdery Mildew
    Compound Time h Dose, million 1Protection rating Example 1 2 100.00 1,0 4 50.00 5,0 - 25.00. 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 96 50.00 5.0. - 25.00 1,0 - - 12.50 1,0
    Table 15
    Application to leaves. Wheat leaf rust
    Compound Time h Dose, million ' 1 ] Protection rating Example 1 72 50.00 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 - - 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 - - 1,0 - 6.12 1,0 2 400.00 1,0 - 100.0 1,0 - 25.00 1,0 72 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0 - 6.12 .1.0 92 50.00 1,0  - 25.00 1,0 - 12.50 1,0
    Application on leaves, rice
    Table Pyriculariasis
    Compound Time h Dose, million '^ Degree of protection against illness Example 1 72 200.00 1,0, ' - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 24 400.00 1,0 - - 100 - 200,0 1,0 - - 1,0 -and * " 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 Example 1 - - 1,0 - - 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 - - 1,0 - - 1,0 4 400.00 8.0 - - 8.0 - 200.00 7.5 - - 8.0 - 100.00 7.5 - - 8.0 - 50.00 6.0 - - 8.0 24 200.00 3.0 - 100.00 2.0 - 50.00 3.0 72 200.00 2.0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 Example 4 24 400.00 1,0 - 200.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 4 400.00 zo - 200.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 Example 4 - 50.00 1,0 Example 7 24 400,0 1,0 - 200.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 4 400.00 8.5 - 200.00 8.5 - 100.00 7.0 - 50.00 6.5 Example 8 24 400.00 1,0 - 200.00 1,0 - 100.00 1,0 - 50.00 1,0 Example 8 4 400.00 8.5 200.00 8.0 - 100.00 7.5 * 50.00 5,0
    Table 17
    Soil irrigation. Rice pyriculariosis
    Compound Time h Dose, f / a Protection rating. from illness Example 1 48 10.00 1,0 - - 1,0 - 5.00 1,0 - - 1,0 - 2,50 1,0 - - - 1,0 - 5.00 1,0. • - 2,50 1,0 Example 4 48 10.00 3.0 - 5.00 1,0 - 2,50 1,0 Example 7 48 10.00 5,0 - 5.00 3.0 - 2,50 1,0 Example 8 48 10.00 1,0 - 5.00 1,0 - 2,50 1,0
    Table 18
    Soil treatment. Septoria Wheat
    Compound Time h Dose, gal / kg Blade protection rating degrees from Example 1 192 1,01,0- ' 0.101,0
    Table 19 Application to the leaves. Septoria Wheat
    Compound Time h Dose, million ** Assessment of the degree of protection against the disease Example 1 -72 6.25 1,0 - 3.12 1,0 72 6.25 1,0 ·· 3.12 1,0
    Table 1EA
    Application to leaves
    Compound
    Time h
    Dose, Gal / kg
    Assessment of the degree of protection against the disease
    Example 1 504 400 , 00 2.0 336 400 , 00 3.0 4400 , 00 7.0 -100 , 00 2.0 *25, 00 1,0 T a b l i c 20 I * · —— “Dose pound / / acreRating protection against disease 1 2 I 30.25 00 9.6 0.5 33 9.8 1 34 9.8 T a blitz 21 Dose,Rating degrees of protection against pound / acre disease 1 1 2 I 30.25 1.70 9.6 0.50 1, about0 9.7 1.00 3.30 9.7
    Table 22 Assessment of the degree of protection against the disease
    Application dose, mln ** 7th day1st sheet 14th day1st sheet 2nd sheet 1,56 20.6 19.3 42.6 6.25 100.0 69.5 54,4 25.00 100.0 98.0 85.6
    Table 23% disease control
    Dose of application, million Den), 7th,1st sheet 14th day1st sheet 2nd sheet 1,56 60.3 58.5 47.6 6.25 100.0 89.6 79.2 25.00 100.0 91.8 86.1 - .....-
    Table 24
    Treatment (days before inoculation) Evaluation (days after application) Application dose-tmillion % disease control 1st sheet 2nd sheet 1 8 1,56 68 ', 5 32,06.25 100.0 66.025.00 100.0 66.0 fifteen 1,56 40,0 06.26 81.1 20.625.00 85.00 50,0 2 9 1,56 60.3 06.25 100.0 20.6 •25.00 100.0 37.0 16 1,56 - 37.56.25 - 29.7625.00 - 18.75 ....T a blitz 25 Processing (days Evaluation (days The dose is •% fight with disease before inoculation) after nane Senia NEWSenia)4 million 1st sheet 2nd sheet 1 8 1,56 68.5 -6.25 80.0 -25.00 93.7 - fifteen 1,56 26.5 20.66.25 63.3 37.025.00 76.8 37.0 2 9 1,56 37.0 0,06.25 84.3 37.025.00 84.3 60.3 16 1,56 28.9 37.06.25 43.6 37.025.00 77.6 50,0 Table and a 26 Treatment (days Evaluation (days Dose nano-% disease control · after inoculum, after application. new tion) Senia) million ' 1
    1st sheet 2nd sheet
    6 1,56 20.6 14.3 6.25 84.3 73.0 25.00 100.0 82.0 thirteen 1,56 23,4 0,0 6.25 75.9 37.0 25.00 100.0 68.5 5 1,56 37.0 66.0 6.25 90.1 100.0 25.00 100.0 100.0 12 1,56 20.6 14.3 6.25 80.1 78.6 25.00 100.0 83.0
    w
    Table 2/
    Treatment (days after inoculation)
    Evaluation (days after application)
    Dose of application, million% of the fight against the disease
    1st sheet 2nd sheet
    6 1,56 50,0 71Y 6.25 100.0 100.0 25.00 100.0 100.0 thirteen 1,56 42.5 7.4 6.25 96.4 53.7 25.00 100.0 84.6. 5 . 1,56 - 93.7 - 6.25 100.0 - 25.00 100.0 - 12 1,56 52,4 7.4 6.25 98.7 53.7 25.00 98.7 53.7T a b faces
    Evaluation (days after application) The dose of application, million - ' % fight new with disease 1st sheet 2nd sheet
    2 6.25 41.7 25.00 63.3 - 50.00 70.8 -
    Table 29
    Dosage, mln - *% disease control
    1st sheet 2nd sheet
    [3]
    6.25 73,588.0
    25.00 58.090.4
    50.00 47.190.4
    Table and a 30 Evaluation (days Dose applied % disease control after inoculum ny, million '* —..... g .......... tion)1st sheet 2nd sheet 2 6.25 60.3 25.00 60.3 50.00 68.5
    Table 3 ^
    Application dose, million ”’ % disease control, 1st sheet 6.25 81.6 25.00 70.8 50.00 76.8
    C 4
    Table 32
    Assessment after) (days applied Dose of senia nane-, million "* % disease control 1st sheet | 2nd sheet 90.788.9 12.51,56 -''and' 8.9 12.53.1235,2 21, 66.2574.3 50.6 T a 6 faces 33 Grade after (daysinoculum Dosage deposited - million ' 4% disease control 1 tion) 1st sheet 2nd sheet 90.7862.5 0,01,5652.75 20.63.1237.50 20.66.2514.88 37.0T a blitz 34 Rating (days Dose nane- % disease control after inoku- senia million ' 1 | rations) 1st sheet 2nd sheet 50.7862.5 37.01,5662.5 37.03.1252.8 50,06.2598.0 100.0 120.7832,7 10.91,5657.6 29.33.1246.6 10.96.2591.6 55,4 T a blitz 35 Grade after (days applied Dose of senia nane- % fight : illnessniya)million - 1 1st sheet 2nd sheet 50.7840.5 ··1,5662.5 -3.1292.6 - '6.2595.3 -
    Compiled by V. Myakushev Editor Tehred M. Morgenthal Corrector O. Yurkovetskaya
    Order 3195 Circulation Subscription
    VNIIIPI of the State Committee for Inventions and Discoveries at the State Committee for Science and Technology
    113035. Moscow. Zh-35, Raushskaya nab., 4/5
    Production and Publishing Plant Patent, Uzhgorod, Gagarin St. 101
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    SU1760983A3|1992-09-07|Method of benzamide derivatives synthesis
    US4203995A|1980-05-20|1-Phenyl-2-azolyl-4,4-dimethyl-1-penten-3-ols and the fungicidal use thereof
    US3499086A|1970-03-03|Methods and compositions for controlling fungal and bacterial infestation of plants utilizing organic tetravalent tin compounds
    HU182903B|1984-03-28|Process for preparing n-alkyl-anilide derivatives and fungicide compositions containing such compounds as active substances
    CN1167568A|1997-12-17|Fungicide contg. fluorodiphenyl acrylamides
    AU717759B2|2000-03-30|Fungicide salts
    SU1088663A3|1984-04-23|Process for preparing acylureas
    HU188758B|1986-05-28|Fungicide and/or bactericide compositions containing new nitro-thiophene derivatives and process for preparing the new nitro-thiophene derivatives
    US4347253A|1982-08-31|Fungicides
    US4554367A|1985-11-19|Phosphonium organohalogenostannates-IV
    SU1410860A3|1988-07-15|Method of controlling fungi
    EP3866602A1|2021-08-25|Method to control septoria tritici resistant to c14-demethylase inhibitor fungicides
    EP0410726B1|1993-09-01|S-substituted beta-thioacrylamides and their use as microbicides
    DE69823191T2|2004-08-19|1,2,3-THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES, MEANS FOR CONTROLLING PLANT DISEASES AND METHOD FOR THE USE THEREOF
    PL84075B1|1976-02-28|
    JP2696723B2|1998-01-14|Fungicide composition
    US4024269A|1977-05-17|Benzimidazole derivatives and fungicidal composition and method
    US4405743A|1983-09-20|Pyrazolylpyrimidine derivatives
    US3355352A|1967-11-28|Fungicidal composition
    NL8300223A|1983-08-16|FUNGICIDES AND METHODS FOR PREPARING AND USING THESE FUNGICIDES.
    GB2136433A|1984-09-19|Phosphonium Salt of N-Formyl-N-Hydroxy-Alanine
    EP0470282B1|1994-06-15|Agricultural or horticultural fungicide
    EP0412681B1|1994-09-28|Azolidine derivatives, process for preparing the same and agricultural and horticultural fungicide
    CN104926738A|2015-09-23|Application of 1,2,3-triazole-4-hydrazide derivatives to preparation of agricultural bactericide
    US3920437A|1975-11-18|Biocidal active carbamyl hydrazones
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    DK592688A|1989-04-27|
    JPH01151546A|1989-06-14|
    ZA887978B|1989-08-30|
    AT92040T|1993-08-15|
    CN1033797A|1989-07-12|
    DE3882646D1|1993-09-02|
    PH26301A|1992-04-29|
    ES2058308T3|1994-11-01|
    IL88133D0|1989-06-30|
    EP0314422A3|1991-02-06|
    EP0314422B1|1993-07-28|
    DE3882646T2|1994-04-28|
    KR890006573A|1989-06-14|
    AU618560B2|1992-01-02|
    HUT49847A|1989-11-28|
    NZ226693A|1990-12-21|
    DK592688D0|1988-10-25|
    CA1301188C|1992-05-19|
    EP0314422A2|1989-05-03|
    BR8805502A|1989-07-04|
    PT88846B|1993-01-29|
    AU2431488A|1989-04-27|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    RU2483540C2|2002-03-19|2013-06-10|Е.И.Дюпон Де Немур Энд Компани|Benzamides and compositions based thereon for use as fungicides|FR1581075A|1968-07-15|1969-09-12|
    MC1329A1|1979-05-17|1981-04-21|Wellcome Found|ARYLOXY- AND ARYLAMINO-ALKANE-THIOCARBOXAMIDES, THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR APPLICATION AS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF PESTICIDE PRODUCTS|
    JPS5758657A|1980-09-26|1982-04-08|Showa Denko Kk|N-alpha,alpha-dimethylbenzylamide derivative and herbicide|
    US4835181A|1987-02-18|1989-05-30|Eli Lilly And Company|Anticonvulsant agents using cyano dimethylphenyl benzamides|
    EP0324521A3|1988-01-11|1991-11-27|Duphar International Research B.V|Method of treating haematologic diseases and pharmaceutical compositions to be used therefor|TW575562B|1998-02-19|2004-02-11|Agrevo Uk Ltd|Fungicides|
    DE19931116A1|1999-07-06|2001-01-11|Bayer Ag|Process for the production of phenethylamines and new chemical compounds|
    AT414694T|2005-05-03|2008-12-15|Bayer Cropscience Sa|NEW HETEROCYCLYLETHYLBENZAMIDE DERIVATIVES|
    TWI435863B|2006-03-20|2014-05-01|Nihon Nohyaku Co Ltd|N-2- arylethylcarboxamide derivative and pest controlling|
    WO2007145221A1|2006-06-13|2007-12-21|Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd.|Aqueous suspension agricultural chemical composition|
    WO2008101975A2|2007-02-22|2008-08-28|Bayer Cropscience Sa|New n-benzamide derivatives|
    EP2353547B1|2008-06-26|2018-01-17|Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.|Agent for regenerating tympanic membrane or external auditory canal|
    RU2596788C2|2011-03-02|2016-09-10|Нихон Нохияку Ко., Лтд.|Endoparasite control agent|
    UY34996A|2012-08-30|2014-03-31|Nihon Nohyaku Co Ltd|ENDOPARASIT CONTROL AGENT|
    UY34997A|2012-08-30|2014-03-31|Nihon Nohyaku Co Ltd|ENDOPARASIT CONTROL AGENT AND METHOD FOR USE|
    CN102827022A|2012-09-21|2012-12-19|西华大学|2-acetoxy-N- benzamide and preparation method and application thereof|
    JP6410790B2|2013-03-14|2018-10-24|ザ ボード オブ トラスティーズ オブ ザ レランド スタンフォード ジュニア ユニバーシティー|Mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 modulator and method of use thereof|
    CN106029069B|2014-03-05|2020-01-24|国立大学法人东京大学|Endoparasite control agent|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    US11265787A| true| 1987-10-26|1987-10-26|
    [返回顶部]